Photographian Singapore
« Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 10, 2010, 2:37am




Photographian Singapore :: Sharing Corner :: Talk about Photography :: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
   [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro (Read 202 times)
USM
Global Moderator
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,144
 Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Thread Started on Dec 14, 2006, 9:03am »

There is a difference between using an extension tube and a teleconverter for macro photography.

Beside what others had mentioned that extension tube is basically a hollow tube without any glass element while the TC has elements in it, which may will degrade the image quality (can't hardly notice it).

The differences are :

1) Extension Tube

- loss of light is inversely proportional to the focal length of the lens. For e.g., a 25mm tube results in a 1 stop loss on a 50mm lens, but only a half stop loss on a 100mm lens, or a quarter stop loss on a 200mm lens.

- no degradation of iamge quality since there is no glass element

- focal length of the lens used remains the unchanged

- Unable to focus at infinity (not an issue since you are shooting macro)

- reduces the minimum focusing distance of the lens, and thus increases the magnification ratio of the lens

- usable for most lenses

- formula to calculate magnification ratio of using a 25mm extension tube :

Magnification = Extension Tube (mm) / Focal Length of Lens

E.g. using a 25mm extension tube on a 50mm f1.8 II lens

Magnification = 0.68x

E.g. using a 25mm extension tube on a 200mm f2.8 II lens

Magnification = 0.32x

It follows that the shorter the focal length of the lens, the greater the magnification produced by a given extension tube.


2) Teleconverter

- increases the focal length of the main lens

- loss of f-stop, 1 stop on a 1.4x TC and 2 stops for a 2x TC

- image quality may be affected as TC affects it especially 2x TC

- magnification or working distance or both increases due to increased focal length of the lens. For e.g. a 1.4x TC will give you 40% more magnification at the same distance or 40% more working distance at the smae magnification or a combination in between

- minimum focusing distance of the lens remains unchanged

- able to focus at infinity

- not usable for many lenses due to protruding element


Given the above differences between using an extension tube and a TC, how does it affect a macro lens? For e.g. EF 100mm f2.8 Macro USM lens.

Using the lens alone, it will give you the magnification ratio of 1:1, i.e. magnification of 1x.

With a 25mm extension tube, the magnification ratio becomes 1.39:1, i.e. the magnification is 1.39x. This means that you are getting larger than life size.

With a 1.4x TC, the magnification ratio becomes 1.4:1, i.e. the magnification is 1.4x. However, only the 3rd party TC like the Kenko can mount onto the lens. The original Canon TC can't use with the lens due to the protruding element.

Therefore, it seems that there is no much of a difference in using an extension tube or a TC on a 100mm macro lens
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
broccoli
Registered Member
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 415
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #1 on Dec 18, 2006, 4:49pm »

how about price different???
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
USM
Global Moderator
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,144
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #2 on Dec 19, 2006, 12:21am »


Quote:
how about price different???


Price difference is

1) Extension Tube - $85-$95

2) EF 1.4x TC - $650 :o

3) Kenko Pro DG 300 1.4x TC - $210-$239
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
fotojoy
Registered Member
*
member is offline

[avatar]

I'm not a pro!



Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 125
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #3 on Jan 5, 2007, 11:16pm »

Duh?!?! Then I will get the extension tube :D hahaha
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
USM
Global Moderator
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,144
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #4 on Jan 5, 2007, 11:24pm »

;D
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
lowlights
Registered Member
*
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 570
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #5 on Jan 7, 2007, 12:41pm »

Bro,

Mind explaining how you get this answer ? ???

Code:
Magnification = Extension Tube (mm) / Focal Length of Lens
E.g. using a 25mm extension tube on a 50mm f1.8 II lens

Magnification = 0.68x



When I try it on my calculator. Magnification = 25/50... I get 0.5X :-/

Please not checking your maths but just want to get it right so I can also figure out the magnification on myside.

By the way does the 1.6x crop of the cam have any effect on the overall magnification ?

Also if the Magnification = Extension Tube (mm) / Focal Length of Lens. Then if we use the Kenko extension tube set of 12mm+25mm+36mm = 73mm. So by doing the math wouldn't it give us 1.46X :o on a 50mm lens ??


Thanks
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
cantaresg
Registered Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 18
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #6 on Apr 12, 2007, 8:56am »

I read somewhere that you cannot do autofocus using extension tubes. Is that true?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
stevewhy
Registered Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Dec 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 254
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #7 on Apr 12, 2007, 11:22am »

oh
« Last Edit: Jul 25, 2007, 10:27pm by stevewhy »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
snipper
Registered Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 627
 Re: Extension tube vs a teleconverter for macro
« Reply #8 on Apr 12, 2007, 5:16pm »


Quote:
I read somewhere that you cannot do autofocus using extension tubes. Is that true?


There are 2 types of extension tubes. Those with eletrical contacts ones can autofocus while the cheaper type without the eletrical contacts cant.

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
   [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!