|
Post by evershine on Mar 12, 2007 10:36:19 GMT 8
Basically dont do any post processing. You take a photo using largest best quality setting on your camera then copy/cut a small area in the middle portion of the photo and view it on the screen at 100%. The cut out small area could be 640x480 or 800x600.
|
|
fotojoy
Registered Member
I'm not a pro!
Posts: 125
|
Post by fotojoy on Mar 12, 2007 12:52:59 GMT 8
ok... thanks.
ST a bit, has anyone ever set the sharpness on the camera ... it's defaulted to somewhere around 3. anyone tried higher??
|
|
|
Post by 28degree on Mar 12, 2007 12:54:03 GMT 8
ok... thanks. ST a bit, has anyone ever set the sharpness on the camera ... it's defaulted to somewhere around 3. anyone tried higher?? you mean the picturestyle? all set to max when taking macro.....
|
|
Fumiryu
Registered Member
Posts: 159
|
Post by Fumiryu on Mar 12, 2007 18:31:20 GMT 8
ok... thanks. ST a bit, has anyone ever set the sharpness on the camera ... it's defaulted to somewhere around 3. anyone tried higher?? you mean the picturestyle? all set to max when taking macro..... Applicable to both day and night? Or just night only? Please advise
|
|
fotojoy
Registered Member
I'm not a pro!
Posts: 125
|
Post by fotojoy on Mar 13, 2007 16:31:53 GMT 8
Tot only for night macro then set everything on the picturestyle to max.
|
|
|
Post by aloyyolaaloy on Mar 13, 2007 16:49:33 GMT 8
i guess its for both... gut instinct
|
|
|
Post by 28degree on Mar 13, 2007 17:32:36 GMT 8
Tot only for night macro then set everything on the picturestyle to max. errr....is it?? now i set to max for all macro shots leh....
|
|
|
Post by cantaresg on Apr 3, 2007 21:07:27 GMT 8
I read in books that it is better to leave the pictures unsharpened in the camera and sharpen only post shooting. so which is better?
|
|
Marcus
Registered Member
Posts: 455
|
Post by Marcus on Apr 3, 2007 21:27:56 GMT 8
Hm.... I read that somewhere before too. I dun feel good in sharpening images everytime using DPP or photoshop too.
|
|
Marcus
Registered Member
Posts: 455
|
Post by Marcus on Apr 3, 2007 21:29:32 GMT 8
Maybe a Mk 3 and a 600mm can solve my problem! kekeke
|
|
|
Post by lowlights on Apr 3, 2007 21:53:30 GMT 8
Hm.... I read that somewhere before too. I dun feel good in sharpening images everytime using DPP or photoshop too. All digital camera maker has one common problem digital noise - period. Their solution is to use the on board chip to reduce this noise. As the chip is doing noise reduction something have to give.. in this case, softer image. Hence, if you want sharper pictures.. than post process using USM is almost mandatory You can hate it, as it would not be what you shoot what you show.. but this is the constraint of digital camera.. Else if you really want to show what you shoot is what you show.. go FILM.. period
|
|
|
Post by lowlights on Apr 3, 2007 21:55:18 GMT 8
Maybe a Mk 3 and a 600mm can solve my problem! kekeke Hopefully it would... go for it... One thing for sure .. it would solve my problem .. I get to try it... hahaha ;D
|
|
snipper
Registered Member
Posts: 627
|
Post by snipper on Apr 4, 2007 0:03:10 GMT 8
1dmk3 and 600mm will give you more problems.
The weight alone will kill you. For those who have not handles heavy lens, you will need about 1 month to get used to it.
|
|
Fumiryu
Registered Member
Posts: 159
|
Post by Fumiryu on Apr 4, 2007 14:26:31 GMT 8
1dmk3 and 600mm will give you more problems. The weight alone will kill you. For those who have not handles heavy lens, you will need about 1 month to get used to it. For Camera body, I think 1D Mk 3 should be lighter as compared to 1Ds because 1D Mark 3 is using Lithium Ion battery whereas 1Ds is still using NiCd. For lenses, 600mm lens is a "bazooka", of course it is verry heavy. Never carry it before though.....
|
|
|
Post by broccoli on Apr 4, 2007 22:45:09 GMT 8
600mm is good...it is not heavy...
|
|