USM
Senior Moderator 
Posts: 1,303
|
Post by USM on Dec 11, 2006 0:27:17 GMT 8
|
|
Canew
Registered Member 
Posts: 184
|
Post by Canew on Jan 23, 2007 11:17:00 GMT 8
Thanks for the test Bro.
|
|
snipper
Registered Member
Posts: 627
|
Post by snipper on Feb 7, 2007 10:18:41 GMT 8
Boss, it will be good if you can include a brief on how the shots were taken. I cant tell much difference due to the low resolution here. even the ISO80 looks bad on my monitor.
BTW how much does this baby cost?
|
|
USM
Senior Moderator
Posts: 1,303
|
Post by USM on Feb 7, 2007 10:23:52 GMT 8
Boss, it will be good if you can include a brief on how the shots were taken. I cant tell much difference due to the low resolution here. even the ISO80 looks bad on my monitor. BTW how much does this baby cost? The catalogue was placed on the table. I merely placed the camera on the table and set to self-timer mode to take these shots. This is to prevent handshake. I guess that you have to view it at home where you have a higher resolution monitor. This baby costs around $670. |
|
|
|
Post by stevewhy on Feb 7, 2007 15:18:32 GMT 8
oh
|
|
USM
Senior Moderator
Posts: 1,303
|
Post by USM on Feb 7, 2007 15:24:11 GMT 8
I bought it for $650 from CP for my sisters. Hehehe.....  Oops..... I bought it at $650. Pai sei for the error. Ny friend bought it at $670 due to more freebies. |
|
|
|
Post by cantaresg on Apr 2, 2007 23:25:45 GMT 8
looks pretty clean for a digital compact. Better than a A710 IS?
|
|
